If a company has its name used as a verb, its popularity is undeniable but it may also be problematic. Although Google is a company name, it is not unusual for it to be used as a verb, as in someone is going to “Google” something. Google and Facebook are listed as verbs on Dictionary.com. The official definition for the verb version of Facebook is “to search for (a person’s profile) on the Facebook website.” In fact, there is actually a Facebook page titled When Did Facebook Become a Verb with an entry as early as 2006.
In 2006, CNet announced that Google had officially become a verb. Google was not the first to be used this way. Think about Xerox. It used to be common to say that something needed to be Xeroxed instead of copied. However, having the company name used as a verb can have its consequences. CNet reported, “Becoming synonymous with an invention may hold a certain amount of historic glory for a company, but ubiquitous use of the company’s name to describe something can make it harder to enforce a trademark. Bayer lost Aspirin as a U.S. trademark in 1921 after it was determined that the abbreviation for acetylsalicylic acid had become a generic term. The trademarks Band-Aid, Kleenex, Rollerblade and Xerox have had similar issues.”
Is Bing the next company name to become a verb? Bing has a nice ring to it like Ping did recently. Perhaps the use of the phrase “Ping Me” has been played out and Bing is too late. It may also become complicated when dealing with past, present and future tense as noted in the following from a New York Times article: